Talk:Boeing E-3 Sentry/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Harrison49 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk contribs count) 12:53, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    The article is well written with good prose.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    The article is well referenced throughout.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    Reliable sources are used.
    C. No original research:  
    There does not appear to be any original research.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    The article covers the major aspects of the subject.
    B. Focused:  
    The article remains focused.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    The article maintains a neutral point of view.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    The article does not appear to be subject to any edit wars.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    Images are tagged as available in the public domain through the U.S. Air Force
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Captions are succinct and informative.
  7. Overall: A very good article and a good read. Harrison49 (talk) 14:11, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Pass or Fail: