Talk:Bogon filtering

"citation needed"

Why is a "citation needed" for the statement that the unallocated space is going to expand drastically with v6? Do we also need citations for the statement that 20-digit numbers are larger than 10-digit numbers? This strikes me as going kinda overboard... Iron Condor 00:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I've never added a link that I'm connected with before, but the "Bogons ate my website" article has been reprinted and published enough times that I felt it was appropriate. If it isn't, let me know.

dead link in page?

Why bogon filtering using BGP is useless This link seems to be to a missing article. I have not tried contacting the author of the site yet; but I think the article no longer exists.

Jengert (talk) 17:05, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I've removed the dead link; feel free to re-add if you find a working version of it and it seems appropriate per WP:EL. —Krellis (Talk) 18:38, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Bogon filtering or Bogon?

There is at least as much discussion of the word "bogon" in this article as there is of filtering same.

Either the title should be changed or a redirect from "bogon" should be added.

MikeSy (talk) 11:48, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

IPv4 exhaustion

IMHO this article could do with updating to reflect that IPv4 is now exhausted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.212.184 (talk) 14:21, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Actually, it is confusing at the moment since it sounds like "IPv4 may be exhausted soon" and later it clearly says "Oh by the way, it is exhausted." I concur that the article could use some help in that sense. Also, are bogons limited to IPv4? Because it doesn't mention IPv6 and I'm sure there are still tons of bogons in IPv6. Alexis Wilke (talk) 18:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Is there any Bogon address space now that IPv4 exhaustion has been declared? Burt Harris 01:08, 29 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burt Harris (talk • contribs)

240.0.0.0/4 (Class E). I believe the reason it was never considered for unicast was widespread hard coded filtering. --Cybjit (talk) 21:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Expert needed

Looks like whomever wrote this article doesn't know CIDR notation and otherwise doesn't know what he/she is talking about.Jasper Deng (talk) 17:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bogon filtering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070414145327/http://www.mcanerin.com:80/EN/articles/bogon-01.asp to http://www.mcanerin.com/EN/articles/bogon-01.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Remove {{Unreferenced section}} from Etymology

In my opinion, the term 'bogon' is adequately explained in the Etymology section, with two references, so stating that references are absent is incorrect. Adding more seems overkill to me, so I propose to get rid of the {{Unreferenced section}} tag. — _D^an_d^orⁱ_D (talk) 20:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Removed. There are 2 refs and a {{cn}} inline so this tag was either uneeded or redundant. ~Kvng (talk) 15:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)