Talk:Bohr–Mollerup theorem
Latest comment: 1 year ago by GhostInTheMachine in topic Not a good short description
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Comment
edit"[...] textbook on probability theory as Bollerup had thought it proven already." - Bollerup = Bohr or Mollerup? --pred 17:20, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- I removed the text, as there is no point in it being here, as long as the name is incorrect. --pred 20:50, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've added the text back in with a correction that both authors published the textbook together, plus a reference to the textbook 128.232.231.16 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC).
When?
editWhen was this theorem proven? --Jobu0101 (talk) 15:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Not a good short description
editUser:GhostInTheMachine, your short description is not helpful. It applies to a thousand pages on Wikpedia. Walt Pohl (talk) 13:31, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Please read the full guidelines at WP:SDCONTENT — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 20:13, 4 December 2022 (UTC)