This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bombala railway line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150310151019/http://www.nswtrainlink.info/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/20752/Southern_Region.pdf to http://www.nswtrainlink.info/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/20752/Southern_Region.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130122061338/http://www.cmrailway.org.au/history.htm to http://www.cmrailway.org.au/history.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121018040529/http://www.cmrailway.org.au/operatio.htm to http://www.cmrailway.org.au/operatio.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Opening description
editThe WP:LEAD talks about a partially-closed branch line (which may well be true)—but is not representative of the present-day role, as the main railway serving the capital city of Australia!… This is likely to be confusing for visitors arriving a the article. Is there a wording that could accurately represent both aspects? —Sladen (talk) 13:09, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- True, I have amended it.--Grahame (talk) 15:08, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
History
editThere is almost nothing about the construction of the line, except a para about Michelago station which seems rather lost and lonely. Downsize43 (talk) 06:24, 3 August 2021 (UTC)