Talk:Bombardier Innovia APM 300R C801B

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit (assessed as Low-importance).

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Requested move 27 April 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 13:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Bombardier Innovia APM 300R C801B → Alstom Innovia APM 300R C801B – Respect Alstom's acquisition of Bombardier in 2021. Edgar Searle (talk) 08:54, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Can you cite sources that support the proposed name? These vehicles appear to have been built by Bombardier prior to its integration into Alstom. 162 etc. (talk) 16:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. We shouldn't retrospectively rename delivered products, and in absence of reliable sources that support the name change. – robertsky (talk) 14:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Oppose without RSes, can't find anything on Alstom's website too. The only site I see that uses a new name is SGTrains (which isn't a RS per WP:UGC) and even then they don't have a source for a name change. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 15:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic