Talk:2010 Yeonpyeong bombardment

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bombardment of Yeonpyeong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120309130908/http://www.law.hawaii.edu/sites/www.law.hawaii.edu/files/webFM/Faculty/N-SKoreaBoundary2003.pdf to http://www.law.hawaii.edu/sites/www.law.hawaii.edu/files/webFM/Faculty/N-SKoreaBoundary2003.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120309130908/http://www.law.hawaii.edu/sites/www.law.hawaii.edu/files/webFM/Faculty/N-SKoreaBoundary2003.pdf to http://www.law.hawaii.edu/sites/www.law.hawaii.edu/files/webFM/Faculty/N-SKoreaBoundary2003.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:01, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Bombardment of Yeonpyeong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725020759/http://www.asianperspective.org/articles/v27n2-f.pdf to http://www.asianperspective.org/articles/v27n2-f.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.eurasiareview.com/analysis/9787-north-korea-construction-of-nuclear-power-plant
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111002085325/http://app.yonhapnews.co.kr/YNA/Basic/article/new_search/YIBW_showSearchArticle.aspx?searchpart=article&searchtext=%ED%95%B4%EC%95%88%ED%8F%AC%20%EC%8B%9C%EA%B0%84%EB%8C%80%EB%B3%84&contents_id=AKR20101123266500043 to http://app.yonhapnews.co.kr/YNA/Basic/article/new_search/YIBW_showSearchArticle.aspx?searchpart=article&searchtext=%ED%95%B4%EC%95%88%ED%8F%AC%20%EC%8B%9C%EA%B0%84%EB%8C%80%EB%B3%84&contents_id=AKR20101123266500043
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101128061027/http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2010/201011/news24/20101124-17ee.html to http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2010/201011/news24/20101124-17ee.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706083503/http://mrecic.gob.ar/com.php?buscar=4867 to http://mrecic.gob.ar/com.php?buscar=4867
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728095526/http://diplomatie.belgium.be/en/newsroom/news/press_releases/foreign_affairs/2010/11/ni_231110_north_Korea.jsp to http://diplomatie.belgium.be/en/newsroom/news/press_releases/foreign_affairs/2010/11/ni_231110_north_Korea.jsp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101125155708/http://www.mfa.bg/bg/news/view/30512 to http://www.mfa.bg/bg/news/view/30512
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726195335/http://www.deplu.go.id/Pages/News.aspx?IDP=4205&l=en to http://www.deplu.go.id/Pages/News.aspx?IDP=4205&l=en
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101205153017/http://mofa.gov.pk/Press_Releases/2010/Nov/PR_293.htm to http://www.mofa.gov.pk/Press_Releases/2010/Nov/PR_293.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717021955/http://english.rti.org.tw/Content/GetSingleNews.aspx?ContentID=114268 to http://english.rti.org.tw/Content/GetSingleNews.aspx?ContentID=114268
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/level2.html?NewsID=15707330&PageNum=0
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120302193746/http://app.mfa.gov.sg/2006/lowRes/press/view_press.asp?post_id=6567 to http://app.mfa.gov.sg/2006/lowRes/press/view_press.asp?post_id=6567
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101125044753/http://www.emirates247.com/news/world/north-korea-threatens-continued-strikes-on-south-2010-11-23-1.320187 to http://www.emirates247.com/news/world/north-korea-threatens-continued-strikes-on-south-2010-11-23-1.320187
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101128004622/http://www.usfk.mil/usfk/showarticle.aspx?id=693&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1 to http://www.usfk.mil/usfk/showarticle.aspx?id=693&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

"Decisive DPRK victory"??

In what sense was this incident "decisive" of anything? What did it decide?

According to the article South Korea still rules over the island and continues to conduct military exercises near it. The major effects of the attack seem to have been that (1) a substantial portion of civilians on the island moved to the mainland, (2) South Korea significantly increased the strength of its military forces on the island, (3) the event constituted an international incident for which many countries criticized the North, and (4) South Korean leadership instructed its military to be ready to return fire more quickly during any future attacks. None of those seem anywhere close to equating to a "decisive victory" for the North.

I'm going to go ahead any make a change for the "result" that is more neutral and more supported by the article's text. If people have suggestions, criticisms, etc. of the revision, by all means feel welcome to make them. 96.83.187.70 (talk) 01:50, 14 August 2017 (UTC)B.A.

I agree. NK's motives and losses are unclear and it was neither decisive nor a victory. Mztourist (talk) 03:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bombardment of Yeonpyeong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101127200218/http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Finland+voices+concern+over+situation+in+Korea/1135261851717 to http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Finland+voices+concern+over+situation+in+Korea/1135261851717
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722134548/http://yonhapnews.hvod.nefficient.co.kr/yna/201011/MYH20101124000100038_WMV700Kbps.wmv to http://yonhapnews.hvod.nefficient.co.kr/yna/201011/MYH20101124000100038_WMV700Kbps.wmv

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 6 January 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 16:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

---

Bombardment of Yeonpyeong → 2010 Yeonpyeong bombardment – To differentiate from the 2024 one FCBWanderer (talk) 16:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Military history has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Korea has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject International relations has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

I think in the recent event (2024) the shells only landed in various places in the sea, including near Yeonpyeong [1]. Earnest question: does that count as shelling "Yeonpyeong"?

Even if not, I could be convinced that having the year in the title wouldn't hurt either way. People may remember this event as the 2024 shelling even if it isn't, and it also may not be the last time that Yeonpyeong factors into NK–SK relations toobigtokale (talk) 17:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

In other words, put me down for support. I can envision a debate around the semantics of "bombardment", but I see this as a harmless to small net positive change. toobigtokale (talk) 00:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.