This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quantum of Solace article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject James Bond, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.James BondWikipedia:WikiProject James BondTemplate:WikiProject James BondJames Bond articles
Agent Strawberry Fields was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 September 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Quantum of Solace. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
@Supermann: I won't argue with the change to cast listing, but why did you move the "end title cards" comment? Aren't Cuervo and everyone below him listed in the end credits? GA-RT-22 (talk) 04:52, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for pointing this out to me. I probably didn't appreciate how "" exactly works. Several seconds ago, I tried to put it behind Judi Dench and before Cuervo and preview the diff, it didn't seem to make a difference at all. Maybe you want to create a subsection like that of the Casino Royale (1967 film)? Thanks. Supermann (talk) 14:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The current formation of the lead is awkwardly worded (e.g., "22nd in the James Bond series produced by Eon Productions" implies they are canonically the same; Eon just produce, the films are not part of one larger universe) contains unnecessary fluff and partial spoilers (e.g., Camile's motivations are not part of the premise of the film, thus spoiling a key part of the plot) and is missing information (e.g., nothing regarding the film's theatrical release or who plays who to delineate the cast). These are only a handful of the issues with the lead, like I also outlined with Casino Royale (2006).
I don't see this as an improvement. Starting with the intro. Distribed by. Why must this mentioned? None other Bond have this. Also "22nd film in the Eon Productions James Bond series" because there are also non Eon Bonds made. Your edit doesn't make that clear.Lobo151 (talk) 04:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
