Talk:Bonin white-eye
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Sabine's Sunbird in topic GA Review
Bonin white-eye has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 27, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Bonin white-eye appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 April 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Bonin white-eye/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 21:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
I'm currently travelling, I have time to read but have to see when I have time to upload the comments, so I might take a few days longer. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- Since 1995 it is known to be a white-eye in the family Zosteropidae, and is closely related to the golden white-eye of the Marianas Islands. – remove "and is" or replace with "that is" to make sentence parts fit?
- Done
- suggest to use the correct dashes (the long ones) for ranges (e.g., 3–4 mm) and separating sentences.
- Done
- It is not stated in the main text since when it was considered a member of the white eyes. This info is in the lead though.
- Added
- nominate – please link
- Done
- There are two subspecies of Bonin white-eye, the nominate, formerly found in Mukojimaand Chichijima – that means the nomimate form is extinct? Would specify for clarity.
- Done
- The nominate race has – use past tense if extinct
- Done
- the think black line – "a" "thin" black line?
- Is it the only member of its genus? I would explicitly state this.
- The species as once found – "was"?
- Fixed
- and a bird from that island were the type specimen – why past, is the type specimen lost?
- should have been was, changed
- and a bird from that island were the type specimen for the species. – this means a bird from the population before its extinction? Would state for clarity
- Clarified on preceding sentence where that fact sits more naturally
- Communication – suggest to name it "Vocalisations", as "communication" would encompass much more (visual, etc) which is not mentioned.
- I think its fine but changed
- image caption: Calophyllum inophyllum, on Haha-jima, are part of the diet of the Bonin white-eye – but which parts? Fruits of? Seeds of? And wouldn't it be better to show a native plant species anyways?
- Changed caption. If I ever find an image of a native plant it feeds on will add it. Sabine's Sunbird talk 19:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- with vines, grasses, pine needles, rootlets, woven in, – maybe "and rootlets woven in"?
- Done
- 19.5–20.5 mm (0.77–0.81 in)x15–15.8 mm (0.59–0.62 in) – I don't think this works with the templates so well. Maybe write like this: "19.5–20.5 mm x 15–15.8 mm (0.77–0.81 in x 0.59–0.62 in)"
- done
- in the lead: two eggs. I would add "usually", otherwise it sounds as if it is fixed to this count.
- fixed
- Warbling white-eyes may have had some effect on the behaviour of Bonin white-eye, – "Bonin white-eyes" (plural)?
- fixed
- The Bonin Islands (Hahajima pictured) have been protected to protect the species – I'm a bit confused; it occurs only on one of the islands? --Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:23, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- It was a big reason for the protection. Clarified.
- Cool, all doneSabine's Sunbird talk 22:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)