Talk:Book of Common Prayer (1559)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Lightburst in topic Did you know nomination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Book of Common Prayer (1559) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Book of Common Prayer (1559) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 June 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 20:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that to prevent bishops from opposing the Elizabethan Book of Common Prayer, reformers had the entire papalist party arrested during a debate? Source: Haugaard, William P. (1968). Elizabeth and the English Reformation: The Struggle for a Stable Settlement of Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. LCCN 68-23179
Created by Pbritti (talk). Self-nominated at 02:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Book of Common Prayer (1559); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Article is eligible and of fantastic quality—moved to the mainspace on 28 May; Earwig shows no issues of copyvio; well-written; all sources appear reliable etc. QPQ done. Hook is interesting (fairly comical which I like) and sourced. I could access the source via Google Books (page 102–03 FYI). ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 02:06, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
