Talk:Book of Nathan the Prophet
Latest comment: 6 years ago by OneWeirdDude in topic Redirect?
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
About Stub
editThis is listed as a stub article. Realistically, what more is there to say about the topic? It is a lost book and the only description we have of its contents is already in the article. Because many people don't know which books are considered part of "the Bible", I think this article should be kept. But the stub designation probably should be removed. RickReinckens 23:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Redirect?
editI think that Nathan the Prophet should redirect to Nathan (Prophet) instead of here. It seems to make more sense to me, but then again I'm not a Christian. Does anyone else have an opinion on this? JSmith60 03:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with you. -Kerplunk- 21:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- You can definitely have an opinion on a faith you don't believe, much like you can have an opinion on Star Wars or Harry Potter - as long as it's NPOV. OneWeirdDude (talk) 20:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)