Talk:Borane(5)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Sharouser in topic Merge proposal

Merge proposal

edit

Borane(5) is interesting but it has virtually no existence outside of a computer. Hence its ChemBox will remain largely empty. What little one can say about this material are principally of interest in the context of that other fleeting species borane(3). So for these reasons, I recommend merging. Others might disagree, but I am thinking about readers gaining a satisfying account of a narrow but interesting topic.--Smokefoot (talk) 19:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

No objection (belatedly...I see you have already merged it). DMacks (talk) 23:37, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
It's existense was confirmed. We should seperate Borane(5) again. --Sharouser (talk) 11:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply