- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the demolished Borgo Vecchio (pictured) in Rome possibly was the road walked down by the Christian martyrs going to death under Nero? Source: "...perchè si credeva che fosse stata la via percorsa dai cristiani che subirono il martirio sotto Nerone..." (Gigli (1990), p. 20)
- ALT1:... that via della Conciliazione in Rome has been oriented like the demolished road of Borgo Vecchio (pictured)? Source: "Pertanto fu scelta la seconda soluzione, tenendo fermo l'allineamento di Borgo Vecchio, e adeguando a questo la nuova fronte." (Gigli (1990), p. 78)
- Reviewed: Bergkirche, Wiesbaden
Created by Alessandro57 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC).
- Article is new and long enough. It is neutral and cites sources inline. However, some paragraphs are lacking citation at the end, where I've added "citation needed" tag. The hook (I prefer the original one) is well-formatted and interesting. Its length is within limit. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" reports no issues. All sources are in foreign language. Image is included in the article, and is ©-free. QPQ was done. I will approve after the above issue is addressed. CeeGee 11:34, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo @CeeGee: done! Alex2006 (talk) 17:32, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- Everything is fine now. Good to go. CeeGee 17:55, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Borgo Vecchio (Rome) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 February 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|