Talk:Borusa

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Ah. so he did appear in Arc of Infinity. Thanks for that! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arno (talkcontribs) 07:55, 3 October 2002 (UTC)Reply

Release from Rassilon's trap

edit

Actually, Borusa was released from it in both Blood Harvest and The Eight Doctors — nice continuinity error when you consider both books were written by Terrance Dicks! Tim! (talk) 16:28, 20 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

LOL 207.202.227.125 02:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
The reason is probably down to the early BBC Books editorial policy which appeared to be that the books were completely detached from the Virgin continuity. This got rapidly revised early on but the Eight Doctors was the very first book. Timrollpickering (talk) 19:01, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply


"Borusa was transformed into a living statue by Rassilon for his efforts; whether the statue survived the destruction of Gallifrey as revealed in "The End of the World" is unclear."

Come on ... In first series that is Rassilon's tomb, and Rassilon is discussed as a powerful, sometimes twisted, Time Lord from far back before recorded history. In the new series he is a living being who leads the Time Lords to destruction. Trying to tie the two together at all is farce.

24.153.200.14 (talk) 14:09, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 14 September 2015

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 11:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply



Borusa (Doctor Who)Borusa – Unnecessary disambiguation, and histories need to be merged. Original article Borusa was redirected in 2011, and recreated in 2015 at Borusa (Doctor Who). — TAnthonyTalk 04:04, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Is it inappropriate for me then to boldly make the move? I don't anticipate any controversy on this.— TAnthonyTalk 14:40, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Does this need a new AfD to discuss its existence, as the prior histmerged version was merged to the list due to an AfD ? -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
The current version is well-cited, I think an AfD is a waste of time.— TAnthonyTalk 15:44, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
There's only one notable topic called Borusa, so it's standard procedure not to disambiguate.— TAnthonyTalk 14:40, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Borusa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply