Talk:Bosporan Kingdom

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 September 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Eumulos. Peer reviewers: Bregresch, Micah6001.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Language

I have tried to re-work the spelling and grammar of the piece which I hope is improved. However, though it is good to have an article full of information, it is pretty intensive. More importantly, it is VERY hard to just "dip" into the article, so if someone could attempt to fix this it would be great.--Brigade Piron (talk) 20:58, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Etymology?

I expected some explanation of the name "Bosporan"...is this country named after a person or place? There is nothing in this entry that explains the name of the kingdom. 69.125.134.86 (talk) 14:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

The "Bosp[h]oran" part refers to the gulf between the Sea of Azov and the Black Sea on the far west of the Crimea where the kingdom was based.--Brigade Piron (talk) 17:44, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

The article states that the Cimmerian Bosporus is not named after the Bosporus. As an assertion (a highly questionable one, I think), this should give a source. The fact is that "Bosporus" means "cow crossing" in ancient Greek, referring to the story of Io crossing from Europe into Asia. The ancients assigned the Bosporus as that location. But I am pretty sure they noticed the similarity of the Cimmerian Bosporus, and named it accordingly, like, "The OTHER Bosporus". However, I DO NOT CLAIM TO HAVE A SOURCE! At the very least, we can guess that they said, "Hey, here's another place she might have crossed!" But I am not putting original research or speculation into Wikipedia, and neither should the editor who claimed without a source that it was not named for the Bosporus. In all probability, it was, and there may be an extant source somewhere. I am deleting the claim. Taquito1 (talk) 14:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Today?

Half of it is recognized bye the world outside Russia as a part of Ukraine and half of it as a part of Russia. Russia claims it all since a few months. Of the issue is uncomfortable the today part should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.247.9.228 (talk) 09:32, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

According to different sources (old and contemporary maps confirm this, including some in the wiki page of the actual Roman Empire), this entity did reach mainland Ukraine, and -- here's where I would like to add: Should the Donetsk People's Republic be taken into account in the today section? Seeing that it used to occupy that area as well (and the "country" still exists to this day). 180app (talk) 02:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bosporan Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091019045452/http://www.fridmanbooks.netfirms.com:80/author_numizmat/Ikar/IKAR.HTM to http://www.fridmanbooks.netfirms.com/author_numizmat/Ikar/IKAR.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Jewish section

There was a paragraph in the section covering the Byzantine period that referred to Jewish history in a mixed up historic mash of Roman and early-Medeival periods: The event of the 'Jewish Diaspora' was a Roman event, and the Khazars link to Judaism was about eight hundred years later, and then the paragraph skipped back to discuss a sect of the First century CE. What I did, provisionally, was to remove the reference to the Khazars from that paragraph, since that is definitely out of place historically, and move the paragraph to its chronological position within the Roman history section.

There really should be further discussion of the Khazar influence and contribution to this history, but that requires research and sourcing that isn't currently in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.6.168.221 (talk) 22:28, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Regnum Bospori (Roman province)

When did Regnum Bospori become a Roman province Iron Attack rules (talk) 14:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)