Talk:Boston/Archive 6
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/the-boston-herald-rumor-clinic-of-world-war-ii/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 18:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Page Creation Demographics of Boston
There should be an extra page created explaining in further detail the demographics of Boston, same way theres pages like "Demographics of Philly", "... of NYC", "...of Chicago", of LA Houston DC etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.90.247.210 (talk) 14:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Molasses flood of 1919
Should we add a section to the article about the molasses flood of 1919? I am asking this because it was a major moment in the city's history. Mrmeme05 (talk) 12:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- It is mentioned on History of Boston; there isn't enough room in this article for a lot of historical details. -- Beland (talk) 22:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 17 August 2021
This edit request to Boston has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Boston population to 675,647 in 2020 according to the 2020 census 108.51.181.54 (talk) 04:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 05:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2021 and 29 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rqshi0915.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
"Bonton Soup" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bonton Soup and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Bonton Soup until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 20:23, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Pronunciation
@Wolfdog, here's my thoughts on the pronunciation. Yes, obviously Boston has the cot-caught merger. But that means that the way people from the Boston area (such as myself) pronounce Boston can give us no information on whether the word contains /ɒ/ or /ɔ/, since we pronounce /ɒ/ and /ɔ/ the same. To find out whether the US pronunciation of Boston contains /ɒ/ or /ɔ/, you have to depend on the pronunciation of Americans who distinguish the two phonemes, and they say it with /ɔ/. (Whereas British people who distinguish the two phonemes say Boston with /ɒ/.) The US pronunciation should be given primary position since it's a US city; it's not inaccurate to say that Bostonians say Boston with /ɔ/, seeing as how we say Boston with the same vowel we use in law and thought and so on. AJD (talk) 00:03, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- I see your point. I myself (an American) in fact say Boston with [ɔ] or [ɔə], so that representation appeals to me personally (which in no way matters of course). It just seems a bit weird to definitively label another perfectly American option, [ɒ], as "UK". It seems that this just comes down to a matter of transcriptional preference. Again, though, I see your point and won't continue to revert. Thanks for discussing. Wolfdog (talk) 12:52, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you as well! AJD (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
It seems that this just comes down to a matter of transcriptional preference.
It comes down to how Help:IPA/English works. The /ɔː/ vs. /ɒ/ difference is the difference between the presence vs. the absence of the lot-cloth split, and we never transcribe the cot-caught merger (which renders the lot/cloth distinction meaningless) using the IPAc-en template. Sol505000 (talk) 20:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
"Boston, USA" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Boston, USA and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 9#Boston, USA until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Section 'Government and politics' incompetent
By way of describing Boston's government, it begins with a sentence naming a hyperlink apparently supposed to stand in for that purpose, and moves on. What does Boston's government comprise? Unbelievably, you never say. We don't want to interrupt our reading and go to a generic article about a "strong mayor–council" government. This is the Wikipedia article on Boston, Massachusetts, one of the world's most famous cities. We want a description of Boston's government. For that matter, what does strong mean in Boston's context? I see no explanation.
The meltdown continues. The next sentence changes the subject to secondary—nay, tertiary—topics, the present mayor's personal background; the length of a predecessor's term; etc. Those facts are fine, but get them out of there, to a place downstream in the article where, after describing Boston's government, you may then talk about the persons in it. Then, however, you do return to the government narrative, which is fine.
But then you change the topic again and mention a school committee. This, without having introduced the topic of "committees" to begin with. Are you still talking about the components of city government? Does it therefore comprise a mayor, city council, and school committee? Is Boston's government tricameral—executive, legislative, and educational? And because you failed to state how many committees there are, does Boston have only the one mentioned? Again, how many bodies does Boston's government have, and what are their names and purpose?
The second paragraph, which is about as far as I got, goes on to talk about other agencies of government. That looks fine to me.