Talk:Bounded mean oscillation
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Quantling in topic Recently added citation of writing of Niccolai, Edoardo
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Recently added citation of writing of Niccolai, Edoardo
editI recommend removal of the citation to a writing of Niccolai, Edoardo (recently added by JeppOne (talk · contribs)), unless it can be supported as reliable and noteworthy.
Please note that there are similar discussions at Talk:Bounded mean oscillation § Recently added citation of writing of Niccolai, Edoardo, Talk:Einstein–Cartan theory § Recently added citation of writing of Niccolai, Edoardo, and Talk:Covariant derivative § Recently added citation of writing of Niccolai, Edoardo. There is also discontinued discussion at User talk:JeppOne § Articles by Niccolai, Edoardo. —Quantling (talk | contribs) 13:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'm just trying to let people know that there are some important writings by my professor. That's all. And I do it for the love of science. Maybe you should inquire about the person in question before "triggering" an unfair censorial judgment, which is to the detriment of the knowledge itself.
- Thank you very much JeppOne (talk) 11:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- @JeppOne: I appreciate that you are working to improve Wikipedia by including material that will make it better. Thank you. I apologize that my request for additional information has come across as triggering or unfair censorial. Especially with newcomers such as yourself, but also quite generally, I try to not do that. It is my goal to work together in harmony with other editors to make Wikipedia the best it can be.
- Alas, none of that addresses the WP:N or WP:RELIABLE questions. Please, I am hoping that you or another will provide some evidence that the primary source, arXiv article you are citing is reliable and noteworthy enough for Wikipedia. Thank you —Quantling (talk | contribs) 13:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, Quantling, for your open-mindedness! Knowledge, in a broad sense, gives thanks. JeppOne (talk) 17:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Because this is a recent arXiv publication, the presumption is that it is not reliable. Please, if you have any evidence that the publication is reliable and noteworthy, now would be a great time to supply it. To keep Wikipedia strong, we need justification along these lines. —Quantling (talk | contribs) 17:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, Quantling, for your open-mindedness! Knowledge, in a broad sense, gives thanks. JeppOne (talk) 17:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Alas, none of that addresses the WP:N or WP:RELIABLE questions. Please, I am hoping that you or another will provide some evidence that the primary source, arXiv article you are citing is reliable and noteworthy enough for Wikipedia. Thank you —Quantling (talk | contribs) 13:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)