Talk:Bourges Cathedral

---

'worst Cathedral'

82.71.27.238 10:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)isn't the phrase 'this is the worst cathedral of the gothic era' rather subjective?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bourges Cathedral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051210221330/http://web.kyoto-inet.or.jp/org/orion/eng/hst/gothic/bourges.html to http://web.kyoto-inet.or.jp/org/orion/eng/hst/gothic/bourges.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:25, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Poorly constructed galleries

An editor has recently replaced the images in the current galleries with much smaller images, putting vertical and horizontal images into square boxes, thereby creating great amount of white space in each box, and creating images which nearly impossible to see. It shouldn't be necessary to have to enlarge every single image in order to see what it is. Tiny images lost in white space don't help an article. This style may be great for the who read only on telephones, but it looks terrible on an I-pad or a Mac Book.SiefkinDR (talk) 14:25, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Its is sad that you only focus of a few screen sizes instead of taking care that all our readers have a proper reading experience. Fact is that almost every screen is different due to the actual size, resolution and font size. Just focusing on I-pad or Mac Book for a proper reading experience is plain missing the point and deliberately excluding whole groups of readers. And as you say: And please don't change them! I don't think architecture articles should are written for those who have the smallest possible screens. One size does not fit all. is a shocking affront to everyone who has a small screen or poor eyesight.. The Banner talk 14:34, 1 July 2021 (UTC)