Talk:Bouygues/Archives/2013

Bouygues Télécom

This link clearly is not good... goes to the sponsor name... shouldn't it be on a page named Bouygues Télécom (bicycle team) or something like that ? (this is what is done in other languages, see interwikis)

ZeroJanvier 18:32, 11 December 2005 (UTC) (my mother tongue is french, excuse my poor english)

Sorted. Two articles, one for cycling team, one for company, with disambiguation page. (cycling team) disambiguation only needed if a company shares the name of the cycling team, which is essentially any with just a single title sponsor. I'm in the process of disambiguating all the links, but that won't take long. Mk3severo 17:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

stop redirect

Please stop redirecting Martin Bouygues here.Zigzig20s 04:25, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Article created.213.249.248.51 (talk) 14:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Pronunciation

Can anyone offer guidance on how the company name is pronounced? Thanks
Arjayay (talk) 12:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I've had a go at adding the IPA pronunciation to the lead paragraph. Gr1st (talk) 13:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Contracts in Turkmenistan

A recent edit draws attention to contracts in Turkmenistant diff also see http://www.lemonde.fr/cgi-bin/ACHATS/acheter.cgi?offre=ARCHIVES&type_item=ART_ARCH_30J&objet_id=1143184&clef=ARC-TRK-NC_01 and http://www.cci.gov.tm/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=206:president-of-turkmenistan-reviews-construction-projects-of-bouygues&catid=38:news-2011 http://www.cci.gov.tm/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=278:president-of-turkmenistan-receives-top-manager-of-bouygues&catid=38:news-2011 http://www.bwint.org/default.asp?index=2483&Language=EN etc

Also http://www.eurasianet.org/node/62567 which alleges bribes, and states over exposure to risk. I don't think this is currently notable, and the eurasianet.org post is over egged - but in case of future events I'll leave the links here so that someone can say "told you so" at a future date.

Perhaps the level of activity in Turkmenistant is notable? Imgaril (talk) 12:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

I added more info to the "projects" section but not about the "controversy" as I haven't found it to be fully clear of POV issues.213.249.248.51 (talk) 14:20, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Merge completed

Wikishagnik (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Neutrality and other issues - the first paragraph is referenced by http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/topic,4565c2252c,4565c25f389,4b87865ec,0.html - which has 0 mentions of the company.

Second paragraph - ditto

Third paragraph - ok. But doesn't state explain controversy

Fourth paragraph - referned from http://www.eurasianet.org/node/62567 (firstly I note that this shows the first paragraph is a copyvio), also the four paragraph is copyvio.

There seems to be some issue here, but it is not well explained at all - in particular why it is a controversy, or reliable sources stating that.

The issues including copvios need fixing soon, and properly.

I could only find one other reference to this http://binjamin.over-blog.com/article-2235383.html a blog - it looks like a hatchet job

I tried archived google news - it's clear that the company has a lot of recent contracts in the company -what I can't find is the controversy.. If someone else want to check more thouroughly then please do so. I did find this http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav020310a.shtml but "guilt by association", (assuming there is any guilt here at all) is not acceptable. I'm not sure whether undertaking "inappropriate" construction contracts is actually the same as a controversy.Oranjblud (talk) 21:37, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.eurasianet.org/node/62567. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:10, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Interested contributors are encouraged to add clean content on the subject to the article, if it seems appropriate. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:10, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Owner(s) : French Government ?

I don't think the French state owns shares of Bouygues, and even if it does (always possible with French groups) it's a small part, smaller than what the Bouygues family and employees own, so I don't understand why it's mentioned. Aesma (talk) 13:54, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

I've removed it - in 2006 the "Bouyges brothers" are stated at main shareholders http://www.economist.com/node/8348645

I can't find any evidence that that has changed.Prof.Haddock (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2013 (UTC)