Talk:Bow Gamelan Ensemble
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editThis page should not have been deleted... Where are you going for index of notability?! Szczels 12:05, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- At the time of the deletion, the article did not contain any information about the notability of this band. Can you cite a reliable source that suggests the band is notable? Stifle 13:54, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- The connection to Richard Wilson (sculptor) might help. But, just because a guy is known as a sculptor doesn't (IMO) automatically make his music side project significant. I wouldn't object to restoration of this to give it more time, but I agree that unless good sources are found to help establish significance, we might not want an article on this topic. Friday (talk) 14:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- OK, since Stifle has no objections, and since it looks like more time to discuss may help, I've undone the speedy but put a prod tag on there. There are sources, but the question of whether this is enough significance for a band may well be debatable. Friday (talk) 14:10, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
AfD
edit | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 April, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Bow Gamelan Ensemble. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.annebean.net/past-projects/1981-1990/119
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://ahds.ac.uk/ahdscoll/docroot/nrla/b/90_Burwell.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.artistsineastlondon.org/essay/seven.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.uel.ac.uk/soundingout/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tonalmotion.org/forum/cowley.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://harpo.pads.arts.gla.ac.uk:8082/NrlaPads/b/86_Bow_Gamelan.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://art.ntu.ac.uk/liveart/recsearch.idc?Search=7057
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060325211144/http://art.ntu.ac.uk:80/ to http://art.ntu.ac.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:14, 6 November 2016 (UTC)