Talk:Bow shock (aerodynamics)

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This page some how is confused with the bow shock. The bow shock was written about the astronomical material and not gas dynamics! Strange but it does not discussed the fundamentals of the detached. As the case may be, the fact remain that detached shock and Detached shock should be the same, --potto 16:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

New Page

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The title of 'detached shock' for this page is not correct. The title is now 'Bow shock (aerodynamics)'. Some effort will have to be taken by someone to make a page for Bow shock (disambiguation), either that I will figure it out soon. The previous author of this article refers to himself in the text which is not appropriate so that has been removed and a stub has been created. I will work on this page soon and try to bring it to the standards of the oblique shock page that I remade. EMBaero 04:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)EMBaeroReply

A question of classification

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As a wise user noted in the other bow shock page (about the magnetosphere) the bow shock phenomenon is entirely a subject of fluid dynamics. The flow of electrons and ions from the sun to the earth is a type of fluid flow and the shock associated with it is due to compressibility effects of the particles in the flow. Therefore, the article currently titled "Bow Shock (aerodynamics)" should be titled "Bow Shock", and the article that is currently called "Bow Shock" should be called "Bow Shock (Megnetosphere)". You should not have an article called simply "Vortex" devoted to the vorticies seen in toilets, with another article "Vortex (aerodynamics)" in order to provide disambiguation between the two phenomena. The article that is an example of an idea should not have a more straight forward title than the article of the idea itself. Jake Papp (talk) 11:59, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Etymology and pronunciation

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is this pronounced as in “bow tie” or “bow down”? Does the phrase come from the bow of a boat? Feel like both of these should be present on this page and the astronomical bow shock page too. 82.132.186.102 (talk) 09:18, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic