Talk:Bowsette/GA2

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Abryn in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 19:49, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply


I mean, I love Bowsette, so how can I not review this? - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 19:49, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
    At one point it notes that Luigi and Peach are visibly shocked, but the sources attached don't seem to state as such. Is there a reliable source that can be used to describe the contents of the image?
    Removed 'visibly shocked', should be alright without that bit of text.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:56, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Seems pretty rad. Good job with it. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 20:57, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply