Talk:BoxBoy! (video game)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Jerm in topic Requested move 15 November 2020
 | BoxBoy! (video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 28, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:BoxBoy! (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 06:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
so neat tho Cognissonance (talk) 06:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Overall
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall: Immediate pass.
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Requested move 15 November 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Pages moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 14:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
– Per WP:NCVGDAB. Series article should get primary placement as the series is long enough. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support In ictu oculi (talk) 17:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support move per nom. O.N.R. (talk) 07:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 20:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.