Talk:Boyz-n-the-Hood

2004 remix

I think the 2004 remix of the song was not done by Cam'ron featuring The Game and Jim Jones. I believe that song was on Jim Jones' LP, On My Way to Church, and featured Lil' Flip and The Game while an alternate version replaced Flip's verse with a new one by Cam'ron.

Could someone please fix this, that'd be great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.80.172.175 (talk) 20:44, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Eazy E

Eazy E is thge best rapper who ecver lived and NWA was the best rapping group ever out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.29.242 (talk) 01:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Sentence Contradicted Itself

"...and featured The Game and Cam'ron (the album version did not feature the Game, however)." That sentense just contradicted itself, does not make sense, please clarify. ruolin59 15:47 UTC

random comment - moved from main page

Ice cube actually had co wrote boy N da hood eazy e had wrote the whole song but ice cube edited some of lines nothing real seirous

I'm a Ho

Doesnt this song sample whodini's song I'm a Ho —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcanmoocanu (talk • contribs) 05:25, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Dynamite hack lyrics.

The Song's lyrics aren't "punkass trippin in the dead of night" its "punkass trippin but its alright". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.73.27.212 (talk) 03:16, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

It's actually both. The album version uses "in the dead of night" the music video version uses "but it's alright". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.194.226.39 (talk) 19:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

ebra9010@yahoo.com- the song boyz n da hood is not the greatest song of all time this is just someone's opinion. Myself,the person whoom editted the article or anyone else can not judge any bill saying what is the greatest song.In my opinion boyz n da hood is a very good rap song by a very good artest.but it is not the best. If eazy e lived to this day he would have told you this one a good piece of work, he would thank ice cube for writing it but he would tell you it is not the best song evr. NOT THE BEST SONG EVER! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.165.31 (talk) 01:09, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Listen the talk pages are to comment on problmes and to add and edit stuff with the article not to comment on the article itsself.74.244.225.180 (talk) 19:59, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Badly written

The structure of the overall article is terrible, but the first paragraph is especially bad. Please, someone, re-write this so that it's coherent and easy to read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doubledragons (talk • contribs) 17:21, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

The synopsis, on the other hand, is a hoot. -ProhibitOnions ^(T) 14:11, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

The edit that re-added the synopsis (which has been removed several times before because Wikipedia isn't a humour site) was just a reversion to a 2010 revision; I've fixed that. Graham87 08:08, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boyz-n-the-Hood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070109075600/http://odeo.com/audio/1987369/view to http://odeo.com/audio/1987369/view

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Background section

This is really awkwardly written, some sentences just don’t make sense. 2A00:23C7:7E87:C501:4CEF:3471:1B93:94B2 (talk) 19:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)