This article was nominated for deletion on 17 January 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 October 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 December 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This person has only a few years of work to stand by and is currently working towards the graduate degree for the field in which he is supposedly noteworthy. This page is premature. Madchalet (talk) 20:58, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
I still tend to agree with this. Almost nothing is cited to reliable secondary sources. There are several interviews of Troemel about his websites, but these are hardly critical commentaries from experienced journalists! If someone re-nominated this for deletion I'd be inclined to vote 'delete'. Sionk (talk) 20:32, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Re-nominated based on the fact that this still reads like a resume. The subject is still in grad school, and the pertinent links all refer back to either a blog site on Tumbler, or a shop on Etsy. Without the reference from Wikipedia there is virtually no notability whatsoever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harryjoy (talk • contribs) 00:29, 18 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
References are both Rhizome articles by same author. Multiple secondary sources from separate established publications are required to establish notability as noted in the notability guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.68.70.52 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I know brae troemel personally. I stand by the decision to keep this page up to date. I think it is good that there is a page about bra. The The is that most of the you don't udnerstand is tat just b/c someone is stil in school doesnt mean they shoudln have a wikipedia page. For isntance, look at many artists who have featured warticles on wikipedia. Thanks.. _Benjamim Moskovitz, Friend of the New Museum — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.204.184.143 (talk) 07:43, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
