I believe this page is a candidate for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Fulfills 'Articles' section 4 of the Candidates for speedy deletion page (and I quote) ' Very short articles with little or no definition or context (e.g., "He is a funny man that has created Factory and the Hacienda. And, by the way, his wife is great."). Turning such pages into relevent redirects may sometimes be appropriate.'

Article has no coherent flow, provides absolutely no information about the subject, indeed if every version in the edit history wasn't this bad I would suspect vandalism. Please remove this utter trash (I live nearby the subject of the article so I KNOW that it is a load of rubbish).--Cynical 20:50, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

If Braehead is a place and you live nearby, then perhaps you could simply convert it into a stub of some sort... [[User:Halibutt|Halibutt]] 01:26, Sep 11, 2004 (UTC)
Done. Now a nice, healthy (and ugly) stub :P --Cynical 18:26, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
My hero! :D [[User:Halibutt|Halibutt]] 20:58, Sep 11, 2004 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:LF 1.gif

edit
 

Image:LF 1.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Braehead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Braehead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Section added - Braehead explosion

edit

Hi. I've added a section to this page on the Braehead explosion of 1977. This came out of a discussion I had with my brother in the aftermath of the Aug 2020 Beirut warehouse explosion (though that was 3000 times more powerful). We both distinctly remembered the Braehead explosion, but it wasn't documented anywhere on Wikipedia that we could find. Does it belong here? Depends if you consider this to be a page about Braehead or specifically about the shopping centre. I've assumed the former, given the page name is Braehead. Then I added two sections about King's Inch (the site's history) and Clydebuilt Braehead for good measure. Xiwex (talk) 14:55, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply