Talk:Bramble shark

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Yzx in topic GA Review
Good articleBramble shark has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 29, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Bramble shark/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 10:17, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Review to follow soon. I see prickly shark is also not in a bad state; if you work up Echinorhinus, you may have yourself a nice little good topic here. J Milburn (talk) 10:17, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • "with the first originating behind the pelvic fin origins" awkward
    • Rephrased.
  • Annoyingly, pharynx currently links to human pharynx
    • I know. I was astounded that a topic as important to evolutionary biology as pharynx doesn't have an article here. Of course, the human-centric slant is rather systemic across our anatomy articles.
  • Lifespan is a dablink
    • Fixed.
  • I think the apparent rarity could perhaps be more explicit in the lead- note that there are few records of them/they are rarely encountered? That said, I note that the Marmara paper mentions that it is actually very common in some seas, which could be made clearer. Is this claim disputed elsewhere?
    • Added note in lead. The statement in the Marmara paper is a slight mis-paraphrasing; the original statement in Compagno (1984) is "relatively common", meaning that most of the known records have come from the E Atlantic and W Indian Oceans.
  • I've added a few categories- I know you're not big on the ocean categeories, and after trying to categorise this one, I see why. I've just gone with categories for the three main oceans.

Very hard for me to fault this one- a very good article. J Milburn (talk) 10:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 02:43, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
The pharynx thing is annoying; I think I'll throw this out to a couple of WikiProjects. Other than that, however, this article seems ready. Nice work, as ever! J Milburn (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review. -- Yzx (talk) 15:13, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply