Talk:Brand X (The X-Files)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified
Good articleBrand X (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starBrand X (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 7) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 21, 2012Good article nomineeListed
July 25, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Brand X (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 17:39, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Review

edit
Lead
  • "critcs" >> "critics"
  • "the witness dies mysteriously who was due to testify against the Morley cigarette company" >> "the witness who was due to testify against the Morley cigarette company dies mysteriously"
  • "soon discover is that a new brand" >> "soon discover that a new brand"
  • "The scenes featuring the insects took up to a full day to film." >> "Those scenes took up to a full day to film."
Plot
  • "the life of one Dr. James Scobie" >> "the life of Dr. James Scobie"
  • "floor, his face ripped" >> "floor, with his face ripped"
  • delinked "thoracic surgery".
  • delinked "nicotine"
Writing
  • Reduced the image to 190px.
  • Okay
Filming
  • Okay
Broadcast and reception >> Reception
  • 11th Hour Magazine >> 11th Hour Magazine
  • "the episode's loss in direction" >> "the its loss in direction"
References
  • Okay

Well, i finished my review and made some minor changes. Since nothing is left to be done, i'm passing the article. —Hahc21 00:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Verdict

edit
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Hahc21 00:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Brand X (The X-Files). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:11, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply