Talk:Braye Harbour
 | A fact from Braye Harbour appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The wording concerning the old harbours unsuitability is poor english and possibly nonsense as regarding damage to the "beams supporting the decks"; firstly these timbers are not known as beams which has another meaning nautically but also are considerable less vulnerable than bottom timbers.
Should it state that "the ships were vulnerable to damage due to swell entering the harbour" ? JDN —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.203.255.2 (talk) 13:06, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Braye Harbour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101130132003/http://www.alderney.gov.gg/Harbour to http://www.alderney.gov.gg/Harbour
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100207003826/http://www.boat-fishing-monthly.co.uk/categories/articleitem.asp?item=530 to http://www.boat-fishing-monthly.co.uk/categories/articleitem.asp?item=530
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)