Talk:Brazilian Dreams/GA1
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Jaespinoza in topic GA Review
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:57, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Comments
- "on April 26–29" well it must have been between 26 and 29, not "on" a range of dates.
- Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 20:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- How so? The Rambling Man (talk) 08:29, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 20:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- Infobox: why aren't the preceding and following albums notable enough for an article?
- I wrote the article for Brazilian Dreams because it won the Latin Grammy, but if it is necessary I can write the other two articles. Javier Espinoza (talk) 20:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- If they're notable, then at the least they should be red-linked. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- I wrote the article for Brazilian Dreams because it won the Latin Grammy, but if it is necessary I can write the other two articles. Javier Espinoza (talk) 20:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- "decided to record an album paying tribute to Brazilian music since he has been invited by several Brazilian performers to play their music" poor grammar. Needs a copyedit.
- "and after his participation representing" seems clumsy, maybe... "D'Rivera also featured in..."
- Both MCG Jazz and Manchester Craftsmen's Guild link to the same page. Confusing.
- No need to over link items like Manchester Craftsmen's Guild.
- Allmusic->AllMusic.
- " features Nazarian performing vocals in Portuguese language in a very convincing way" what? firstly bad grammar but secondly an odd thing to note.
- Avoid SHOUTING in the references.
I'll put the nom on hold for a week or so. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:01, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.