Talk:Brazilian monitor Ceará/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:56, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

1. Per WP:CITESHORT the notes need the year of publication added.

1. That's a guideline, not a requirement.

1. Donato, Hernâni (1996) (in Portuguese) needs an ISBN added

1. OCLC # added instead

1. The external link Brief history of Ceará (Portuguese) is dead

1. Deleted.

1. There is a difference between the draught imperial measurements between the text 4 ft 11 in–5 ft 0.6 in and the inf box 5.0–5.1 ft

1. Fixed

1. The text also has two tubular boilers while the inf box claims 4 boilers

1. Fixed

1. The lede is a bit small at one paragraph but I can see little to use to expand it

1. Agreed, not a whole lot to work with. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:47, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

--Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

• Passed GA Jim Sweeney (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2010 (UTC)