Talk:Breakdown (video game)

Editing

Not sure who originally wrote this but it was either by a reasonably good writer who was a reasonably bad gamer OR a reasonably bad writer who was a reasonably good gamer....either way there was far too much reptition and opinions.

The story and gameplay parts might need a little more work as Its not a game I've played in any great length. :)

--Morda Statca 17:12, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Article cleanup on aisle 4! -Matt Musgrove 19:35 June 17, 2006

This article is awesome. The person who wrote it clearly did so while on a break from writing Starcraft/Harry Potter fanfics. 204.69.40.13 14:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Novel

A Google search for "Matthew Schindler" and "Breakdown" gives only the Wikipedia article as a source for this information. That doesn't say much for the noteworthy status of the section, so I'm removing it. NighTrekr 09:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Breakdown Review

After reading the story line and thinking of how good the game can be, this game sounds like a keeper. But I would also like to know how the ending is. Other than that, this game itself is sounding like a bit more than Halo or Half-Life, but that is my opinion. Nice game other than that!--Zhang Liao 05:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Wow

I didn't expect to have to read a whole novel, but the story was pretty good. ShinraiTS4 21:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Development Section

This article is amazing in terms of plot and format, but it desperately needs expansion. Might be good to start on the developments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techcom0 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

WP:VG article assessment (21 September 2023)

This is a personal template to provide advice in the course of completing a content assessment or reassessment for the WikiProject for video games. It's not a part of the project itself. For formal guidance when creating and editing articles under this project, please consult the project’s content assessment guide and manual of style. The template can be found here.

Category	Flag	Comments
Overall		The article contains meaningful content about the subject matter, and is supported by some citations and multiple sections, but falls short in form and content under the manual of style.
Layout		The article has sections that generally conforms to the standard layout under the manual of style, but is ordered incorrectly or potentially missing sections that may help improve the article.
Lead section		The lead section mostly conforms with the manual of style, but the opening sentence misses key details and/or the paragraph does not summarize the content of the article.
Infobox	Y	The article contains an appropriate infobox.
Gameplay		The article contains a description of gameplay, but is either insufficient to cover a clear description of the game or has excessive or trivial details.
Screenshot and cover art		The article does not contain both a screenshot and cover art for the game.
Plot		The article contains a plot section that may have issues, such as being incomplete or having excessive length, or an inappropriate tone.
Development		The article contains a development section that may be incomplete, have trivial details, or focused on minor milestones such as announcements or trailers.
Reception		The article's reception section has issues, such as insufficient content, clutter in the section, overuse of direct quotations, undue weight or trivia. The article may also benefit from a review aggregator score and ratings template if appropriate.
Sources		The article contains reliable sources, but the article's content is poorly or unevenly cited, is heavy on primary sources, or the sources are inconsistently formatted.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:07, 23 September 2023 (UTC)