Talk:Brecksville-Northfield High Level Bridge
Latest comment: 12 years ago by TJRC in topic Possible source
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Anthony Hayne was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 17 August 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Brecksville-Northfield High Level Bridge. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Possible source
editAs noted in the source code for the article, this .pdf has a lot of information, but probably can't be used because its own sources are ambiguous with respect to which has what information. Mapsax (talk) 05:30, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- I think it's okay. The application was prepared by Eric Johannesen, who I'd consider to be a reliable source.
- This document indicates the bridge was still on the National Register in 1994. Any idea why it's no longer listed? - Eureka Lott 04:12, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
- No idea, and I've been pulling my hair out trying to figure out why. Just searched the PD and Beacon Journal archives, and nothing there, either, apparently.
- I'll let you do the honors of incorporating info from the above document into the article :) Mapsax (talk) 13:05, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
- Is there any reason to believe that it is no longer listed? I get the impression from the NHRP website that they don't claim it is all online yet: "We are currently digitizing our records and have put many of them online in our database...". TJRC (talk) 20:13, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
- (update) Hmmm... it is not listed in here, either, and this is purportedly a "spreadsheet of all the listed properties". TJRC (talk) 20:25, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Consensus and NPOV
editIt appears that there is one editor who keeps making changes to this article that quickly get reverted. Please can people discuss here any edits they would like to make so that we can establish consensus for a NPOV version, without edit-warring. --Nigelj (talk) 15:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- The contested passage is a commentary about a statement by an Occupy Cleveland spokesman, which begins, "A dubious claim given Anthony Hayne signed the lease for the Occupy Cleveland warehouse."[1] That is a clear violation of NOR and NPOV. Also, could editors please use complete sentences when editing articles. TFD (talk) 15:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Additional ODOT sources
editA couple additional sources from the Ohio Department of Transportation:
- "2006 Arch Bridge Assessment Report of Concrete Open Spandrel Arch Bridges, Concrete Filled Spandrel Arch Bridges with Three or More Spans, and Stone Spandrel Arch Bridges with Three or More Spans" (PDF). Ohio Department of Transportation. July 31, 2006. p. 32. Retrieved November 21.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|accessdate=(help) - "Historic Bridge List" (Excel). Ohio Department of Transportation. September 27, 2010. row #432. Retrieved November 21.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|accessdate=(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|1=(help)