Talk:Brian Sterling-Vete

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

This reads like self-authored publicity puff

edit

Untitled

edit

Hi--I am a newbie, so I will try to get the links fixed. I used some examples and read a lot on citation links, but I obviously didn't get them right. We will do so.

That said, I'm very confused. I see an afd request on the page. One place, it shows that in one day (before I could comment), it was deleted, and in another, shows it is to be kept but needs editing.

Can someone clarify for me what I need to do to keep this article up and improve my links, references, etc.? I truly believe we have met all the requirements for notability, and there is more I could add for citations and references if I have a chance to do so.

I would very much appreciate some guidance on this!

Thanks


Lkcarnes (talk) 18:09, 24 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi--I have read a lot of articles about what I should/shouldn't do with links on this page.

I am frankly just not sure how they should be fixed, but if someone could give me the top 1-3 things to do to fix them, I will do so immediately. I want to make sure I do whatever I need to in order to make this page right and save it.

Many thanks in advance from the newbie

Lkcarnes (talk) 16:50, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Use internal rather than external links to Wikki Pages. Remove infomtion that can't be referenced by an external source Bihco (talk) 07:34, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Promotional vehicle

edit

This page reads as a promo for its subject. Suggest radical trimming down to info supported by third-parties. The Interior (Talk) 18:37, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I edited the page to address the issues raised--self promotion and deleted some info that can't be verified online by third parties. I do have question--not everything has internet-available validation, but the information is nonetheless true. I left information in that is true and valid that rounds out the background and accomplishments.

I request validation and would like to get the article back to its original form, without the warnings. If there is more that needs to be done, I am happy to address changes that make sense. Lkcarnes (talk) 12:42, 12 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I see the nominator is out until July and nobody has joined in on this conversation in almost two months. I am removing the notifications for now, and if the nominator wants to raise this conversation again upon return, I will be happy to work with them to address any remaining issues, if any. Lkcarnes (talk) 14:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brian Sterling-Vete. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply