Talk:Bride price

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 2601:155:100:7D:9DCA:691C:8FF4:AD4B in topic Thailand sin sod citation

Thailand sin sod citation

edit

Can someone please show a reputable citation and source for the part where it says that sin sod is $0 for a divorcee who has children from an ex-husband? There's so much misinformation and misogyny-based information about Thai women and marriage online from guys who get scammed by prostitutes and I've learned most of this information is false. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:155:100:7D:9DCA:691C:8FF4:AD4B (talk) 06:08, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Africa Section Seems Editorial

edit

Under the Africa subheading, when discussing bridewealth in Uganda, the article gets pretty editorial, showing bias against NGOs and taking a clear position on the issue of bridewealth in Africa generally.

142.105.198.70 (talk) 14:49, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

    This hasn't been addressed a year later. Would it be possible to mark as "original research" or "not impartial" with heading tags? I've seen it done for entire articles but not sure how to do for just a section.

The section has a citation, but regardless of authenticity, the entire premise is polemic. The encyclopedia is supposed to be neutral, whereas this is defending/justifying/promoting one view over another — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:8BC:F100:3DC1:E923:8B33:B6F8 (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Miscellaneous Notes

edit

Bride price also known as bride wealth or a dower is an amount of money or property paid to the parents of a woman for the right to marry their daughter. (Compare dowry, which is paid to the parents of a man.) [edit]

History of the tradition

The Hebrew Bible and Talmud mention the practice of paying a bride price to the father of a minor girl.

The tradition of giving bride price is still practiced in many Asian countries although the amount changing hands is more a token amount to continue the traditional ritual then an actual price-tag attached to the bride-to-be for marriage.

In Chinese culture, an auspicious date is selected to 'Ti Qing' (literally meaning 'propose marriage'), where both families will meet to discuss the amount of the bride price demanded, among other things. A couple of weeks before the actual wedding, the ritual of 'Guo Da Li' (literally meaning 'performing the rites') takes place (on an auspicious date of course). The groom and a matchmaker will visit the bride's family bearing gifts like wedding cakes, sweetmeats and jewelry as well as the bride price. On the actual wedding day, the bride's family will return a portion of the bride price as a goodwill gesture.

The practice of bride price also existed in India, where it was considered as a social evil and the subject of a movement to eradicate it in the early 20th Century. Unlike what happened in the case of dowry, this movement was largely successful.

In parts of Africa the validity of a tradional marriage ceremony depends on the payment of a bride price which can vary from a token amount to really exorbitant figures. [edit]

The tradition in art

A famous Telugu play "Kanyasulkam" (Bride Price) satirised the practice and the brahminical notions that kept it alive. Though the practice no longer exists in India, the play, and the movie based on it, are still extremely popular in Andhra Pradesh.


Merge with Dowry

edit

These two pages are both somewhat short and discuss similar traditions. Additionally, the Dowry page has a section on Mahr which isn't really a Dowry anyway. It would be more useful to just combine all three for easier comparison. 69.162.24.222 04:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I would have to disagree, there is a vast and diverse array of methods and modes of bride price, some of which do and some of which do not relate so closely to dowry. If anything Dowry should be merged into bride price and bride price should stay the primary article name. Bride price is the dominant form of the practice, where as dowry may very be considered a specific case. Solidusspriggan 07:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I disagree with the merging proposal. Both articles should be expanded, and there is no reason to merge opposite concepts. Also, the information in the dowry article about customs which are really more similar to bride price should be moved into this article instead, and I will do this tomorrow if there are no objections, but the section that actually describes dowry should remain its own article. Academic Challenger 03:43, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

In Thailand, everyone calls bride price "dowry". I've never heard anyone use the term "bride price", probably because it sounds like one is selling one's daughter to the groom. Merging dowry here seems to make little sense, because the term "bride price" clearly could never vary in meaning over time enough that it would include a payment to a groom's family. On the other hand, the term "Dowry" is already being used in some cultures to refer to "bride price". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tainscough (talkcontribs) 21:07, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dowry = Dower

edit

Dower and Dowry are virtually synonymous in English. I don't know where editors got the (unattributed) idea that one is brideprice and one is paid by the bride's family... but OED, for example, considers both words to refer, primarily, to the payment by the bride's family, which is (AFAIK) the most common tradition in the West. In Egyptian English, I can attest, the word dowry is always used to refer to the money paid by the groom's family to the bride (brideprice would be considered a rather offensive term in this case). On the other hand, the Greek príka is also normally translated as dowry, although that is paid by the bride's family to the groom. For all intents and purrposes, the word dower is moribund. But the article really ought to be merged with dowry, as both refer (generally) to financial transactions accompanying marriage, without permitting further distinction.

The combined article should indicate that dowry traditionally refers to the typical Western standard of payment from the bride's family to the groom (or his family) but that it can refer equally to the payment by the groom's family in a non-Western context. Tkinias 19:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

The above is absolutely correct. Asian cultures refer to "bride price" as "dowry". If any merger takes place, "dowry" should be the main article, with "bride price" subsumed under that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tainscough (talkcontribs) 20:46, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Check out the dower article.
"Dower" is, in fact, property given to the bride by the bridgroom. It therefore remains with the newly wed couple and normally split out of the marital property only when the woman was widowed or divorced.
I have revised the lede to reflect this. Goldfritha 03:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Humm. The "Similar traditions" section would be more properly shifted to the "dower" article rather than including redundant information here. Goldfritha 19:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
It is my understanding that "dower" in this exact context is a historical term. I believe that "dower" has a modern legal definition something along the lines that a woman can exercise her right of "dower" and inherit her deceased husband's estate regardless of what his will states. I believe that the "similar traditions" section is useful, as I stumbled upon this (generally unclear) article looking for information on a "similar tradition" incorrectly termed "dowry". Geojengineer 15:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Still Legal?

edit

Is this still legal practise, for example in the US? This page is being cited by a site called [Marry Our Daughter] in defence of their site. 87.194.195.109 07:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Of course it is legal. How could it be made illegal? Would the law read, "You may not give money to your inlaws"? Who would enforce that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tainscough (talkcontribs) 20:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Missing 'not'?

edit

The sentence "The woman might have control of this morning gift during the lifetime of her husband, but is entitled to it when widowed" seems to require a "not". Can someone knowledgeable confirm? Bn (talk) 21:21, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bride price. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Potential addition for the section "Today"

edit

In Bulgaria (and maybe in other European countries) the Roma people still organize markets for women. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctgsOkFsxgE

2A00:4802:32D:4000:FFEC:4C59:A12A:2BB6 (talk) 20:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

"prior to existing records"?

edit

In the first paragraph of the article it says "Many cultures practiced bride pricing prior to existing records". Doesn't that require its own record to be even asserted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vnc.brasil (talkcontribs) 11:50, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply