Talk:Bridge to Terabithia (2007 film)/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Pmlinediter in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Quality of referencing improved somewhat before review
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    I have doubts whether the plot is really like a summary
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Consulting experts to verify length of plot is acceptable. Pmlinediter  Talk 09:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
    At first glance, I'd say the plot section does a fairly good job at summarizing the film. Indeed, it seems to be of appropriate length for a 90-minute movie, at least from what I've seen in similar articles. Towards the middle I found it a bit hard to keep track of the characters, but it should be fine for GA's sake. What a depressing ending, as well! Cheers, –Juliancolton | Talk 09:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
    Passing per Julian. Pmlinediter  Talk 09:40, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply