Talk:Bridget Parker/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by ThinkBlue in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the Teen pregnancy section, "...further adding she wouldn't have liked to film the storyline" ---> "...further adding she would not have liked to film the storyline", per here. In the Departure section, "Mignon announced that her reason for leaving the show was so that she could return to studying an Arts degree at university", does the university have a name? In the 2007-2009 section, you don't need to add who Declan Napier and Susan Kennedy are played by since it's already noted at the Disability section.- Everything fixed. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 23:47, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- Check.
- Everything fixed. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 23:47, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Reference 13 has a different url link path, so you might want to update that.
Done
- Check.
- Reference 13 has a different url link path, so you might want to update that.
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Not that much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for taking this on. :) - JuneGloom07 Talk? 23:47, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- You are quite welcome. Thank you to JuneGloom for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:40, 3 August 2010 (UTC)