Talk:Brigalow Belt
![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brigalow Belt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090704211613/http://www.anra.gov.au/topics/vegetation/extent/qld/ibra-brigalow-belt-north.html to http://www.anra.gov.au/topics/vegetation/extent/qld/ibra-brigalow-belt-north.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Brigalow Belt South and Brigalow Belt North are biogeographic regions deserving of their own articles??
editI do not really understand why Brigalow Belt South and Brigalow Belt North are redirected here. Both deserve a definition of their own. However, since this now seems extremely difficult to do. I have tried to make it more obvious that the interested reader needs to look at IBRA. MargaretRDonald (talk) 04:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Flora section: ce needed
editThe last sentence of the first para needs some help. It is not possible to discern which tree species "…are now intact primarily on the higher slopes." and all of the presumably helpful but annoyingly innumerable refs are hard copy. I cannot correct this sentence. Boscaswell talk 08:01, 30 July 2023 (UTC)