Talk:Brigantia (goddess)

Is Brigantia the one that the Celtic mythology link "Britannia" should be linked to? ---G.T.N. (talk) 21:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Is that link still out there somewhere, and: no, hopefully not. Trigaranus (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Statue identification

I've come to find a large part of image identifications given in modern publications somewhat on the tottery side. What reason is there to attribute the statue on this page to Brigantia? Is there an inscription or an attribute otherwise allowing for an identification? Sorry to be a pain, but there are so many books (even otherwise quite serious ones) around attributing names to ancient images more or less randomly. Trigaranus (talk) 22:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brigantia (goddess). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060217084703/http://monasticmatrix.usc.edu:80/commentaria/article.php?textId=6 to http://monasticmatrix.usc.edu/commentaria/article.php?textId=6#_ftn8
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060101035147/http://compute-in.ku-eichstaett.de:8888/pls/epigr/epigraphik to http://compute-in.ku-eichstaett.de:8888/pls/epigr/epigraphik

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Footnotes?

Would it be bad manners if I converted the inline references to footnotes, perhaps using {{sfnp}}? We currently have both inline citations and footnotes, and personally I hate the inline clutter (just my opinion, obviously). Q·L·1968 ☿ 16:19, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Hearing no objection, I've implemented the change. There is value in using a consistent style in the article, I think. Q·L·1968 ☿ 03:49, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

1

Brigantia is erroneously equated here with Brigandu. Even a vague statue of so-called Brigandu in Rennes is used as Brigantia's title picture. Use instead this image of Dea Brigantia from the national museum of Scotland: https://www.nms.ac.uk/explore-our-collections/collection-search-results/sculpture-figure/141383. This is the only verified icon of Brigantia remaining to us (there is an inscription on the bottom stating Brigantia).

There are eight inscriptions relating to Brigantia worldwide. All are found in Britain. Brigandu is known from just one inscription in Gaul. They are not the same deity. This article correctly distinguishes between Brigantia and Brigit of Ireland but does not Brigantia and Brigandu of Gaul. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vestigium2 (talk • contribs) 11:17, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Do we have a photo of national museum of Scotland sculpture?©Geni (talk) 18:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

another inscription in leeds

https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/630

Not sure if that passes RS mind.©Geni (talk) 18:41, 21 July 2022 (UTC)