Talk:Brighton Secondary College

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Assess

edit

Brilliant length - lots of topics. Its short of wikilinks but don't go crazy on this - for instance .. shouldn't you be able to click on Minister for Education... and shouldn't there be a ref (see the ref and references tags on the edit page). You can make a B. A bit of neutral honesty may come across to some as "bigging up" :-) Victuallers 12:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Vanity Why is this school here? It is not significant in any way. Just another private school principle with a permanently flaccid penis trying to big him self up. --Heavy Man 05:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • This is not a private school and the principle is a woman, so learn about the place before you attack it next time. -User: Wise_Wolf_of_Wiki 5:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Vanity - "Why is this school here?" - why are you here? Posted:???
  • BTW - I've done a lot of adding to it, a LOT more needs to be done. Ironically the school itself is banned from editing it's own wikipedia article... EDIT: cheers Victuallers - will do with the advice.

T3h Met 1958, 28 May 2007 (AEST)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Brighton Secondary College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply