Talk:Brimfield (CDP), Ohio

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Recent edits

edit

Another note I noticed on the edits reverted by Nyttend...most of the information he removed was not only unsourced, but it was also about Brimfield Township. This article is about the Brimfield Census Designated Place within Brimfield Township, but not the township itself. Please keep that in mind when adding additional info to this article as well as making sure it is properly sourced. --JonRidinger (talk) 16:23, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

To add to article

edit

To add to article: the year Brimfield was established. I believe 2016 is its bicentennial year, but there is currently no mention of this in the article. 173.89.236.187 (talk) 19:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

That's because this is about the census-designated place known as Brimfield, which is just a part of Brimfield Township. The article on the township itself can be found at Brimfield Township, Portage County, Ohio. --JonRidinger (talk) 01:28, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Informal move discussion

edit

I've been thinking about the whole issue of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and it seems this article would be better served at Brimfield (CDP), Ohio with Brimfield, Ohio as a redirect to Brimfield Township, Portage County, Ohio. Along those same lines, the Atwater, Ohio article would be the same, going to Atwater (CDP), Ohio and redirecting Atwater, Ohio, to Atwater Township, Portage County, Ohio (which it previously did...the Atwater CDP debuted in the 2010 census). My reasoning is simply that the CDPs are virtually unknown locally. Yes, they show up on maps, but few people, if any, know what the CDP is or recognize it as a measure of the community. When "Brimfield" or "Atwater" are identified in primary and secondary sources, it most often is referring to the respective township as a whole, not the CDP or the hamlet at the township center. WP:CITIES even discussed the whole issue of mentioning CDPs a little while back. I wanted to get some feedback, though, before a formal move request. --JonRidinger (talk) 05:19, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brimfield, Ohio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply