Talk:Brinda Karat/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Brinda Karat. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Citation needed for Radhika Roy & brinda karat alleged relation

Latest comment: 15 years ago11 comments3 people in discussion

citation needed for Radhika Roy's & brinda karat's alleged relation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.6.230 (talk) 02:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

This page looks like an Left PoV whitepaper on Brinda Karat's life :"when she returned she knew". Does not subscribe to the wikipedia standards of quality. Someone Kindly update with more objective viewpoint.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.140.37.2 (talk • contribs) .

You need the condemnation to show the aftermath of her attack on Baba Ramdev and how she hurt the sentiment of Hindus. The left backed down on the issue after that, therefore there is no counter-response.Bakaman%% 15:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Nonsense. The wordings on the controversy are like copied from a Hindutva website. Why is there no actual main stream media references on the issue? Why has the pro-RSS editors not chosen to write a single line on how the issue started? (as a labour conflict, with Ramdev's own volunteers striking for minimum wage) why is there no mention that the claim of human body parts was brought up not by karat, but by the dismissed volunteers? why is there no mention that the test made on Ramdevs medicines confirmed presence of animal substances? And finally, please talk about Hindus as a politically uniform group or claim that RSS has the right to speak on behalf of Hindus worldwide. --Soman 15:08, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

See [1] for a comprehensive overview of the issue. --Soman 15:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Moreover, the wording 'otherwise supportive' is purely fictional. CPI(M) gives conditional support the UPA government. But the Congress and CPI(M) are hardly that close, and are in fierce competion in the Left-ruled states. --Soman 15:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

For CPI(M):s viewpoint see [2], [3], [4], [5]. --Soman 15:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes, but Sharad Pawar, Mulayam Singh Yadav, and N.D. Tiwari have all condemned the attack. Please don't tell me these people are even remotely good Hindus (especially Yadav). Even Ambika Soni, high ranking member of Sonia Gandhi's circle supported the Baba. They just saw the sense in the argument of Baba Ramdev. No one except for the commies supports Karat.Bakaman%% 15:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Otherwise supportive. Both the Congress and the Commies hate the BJP and both play vote-bank politics and try to discredit anything Indian. The congress realized their mistakes. The commies are just angry that they got served by the Baba.Bakaman%% 15:26, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

This just gets more and more bizarre. Demanding fair wages for workers = discrediting India? Who's discrediting who? --Soman 15:28, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Fair wages! She just hates Ramdev and yoga. She's bought up by pharma companies.Bakaman%% 15:30, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Oh and Ramdev was found innocent. BBC Story Bakaman%% 15:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Ramdev is not affiliated with any political party. The CONGRESS party (rulers of Uttaranchal) also strongly condemned the attack. Please don't tell me the congress party is a protector of Hindutva. Did you see D. Pratap's quote? (Link 4). That sounds like STRONG language to me. The whole episode showed Karat and the CPI9M)'s true colors (Red)Bakaman%% 16:00, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Who was it that burned Karat's effigy? You must differentiate between protest and disagreeing. The fact that Congress leaders distanced themselves from Karat could rather be seen as a tactic on their behalf not the get their share of condemnation. --Soman 05:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

controversy section

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Its well sourced. I see no need for vandalism on the part of users. The Baba Ramdev page, is nearly half devoted to controversy. Brinda Karat's remarks (and allegations she is merely a tool of Coca-Cola and other MNC's) were far reaching.Bakaman _Bakatalk 00:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

The birth date of both Brinda Karat and Prakash Karat is listed as 19th October 1947 . please correct the error.

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The birth date of both Brinda Karat and Prakash Karat is listed as 19th October 1947 . please correct the error. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.214.80.129 (talk) 06:00, 31 March 2007 (UTC).

About ur rally in Bidar, Karnataka State

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Madam,

 Good evening madam,  I liked ur rally in our Bidar. i am one of the resident to this concern district. Basically in our mind, i my self unable to participate in ur rally. But i have known very well closest to u. when u have entered in deputy commissioners office. What a grate rally u have created. in my whole experience i have never seen such type of rally in my life. The raining could not affected ur rally. I salute to u.

  Realy the officers of Zilla panchayat and elected people of Pachayat are responcible and cheating for this. How could our Bidar people to  punish? i dont no..

 I think realy ur working for poor people. Hope ur rally justice for poor people to get good salary on behalf of Udyog Khatri Scheme in this drought like situation.

Sincerely,

One of the well wisher of the Bidar Dist. resident. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.132.196 (talk) 16:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Brinda Karat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brinda Karat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC)