Talk:Bring New Orleans Back Commission

Correct title

Is it just me, or is the title of this article incorrect? It's the Bring New Orleans Back Commission, not the Bring Back New Orleans Commission, right? — Muffuletta 04:06, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Good catch. I've moved the article. -- Infrogmation 15:23, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bring New Orleans Back Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070313171022/http://www.nola.com:80/search/index.ssf?/base/library-90/113238539035800.xml?nola to http://www.nola.com/search/index.ssf?/base/library-90/113238539035800.xml?nola

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bring New Orleans Back Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060207094640/http://www.bringneworleansback.org:80/ to http://bringneworleansback.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:31, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bring New Orleans Back Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060508145810/http://www.phelpsdunbar.com/pages/profile.asp?id=79 to http://www.phelpsdunbar.com/pages/profile.asp?id=79
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bringneworleansback.org/
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130129174247/http://www.neworleansonline.com/katrina/cvb/proposals.html to http://www.neworleansonline.com/katrina/cvb/proposals.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.uli.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=NOLA1&template=%2FCM%2FContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=41013

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Removal

Bring new orleans back foundation was a once only meeting of local city leaders after katrina. Small towns have these meetings all the time. No initiatives were made, no other meetings too place. During katrina there were dozens of groups like this and none are mentioned. The sources are local and old. they arent very mainstream or accurate or have any backup. Alot of local opinions get put into small town papers. The people put themselves in wikipedia even though though the foundation never came about. There is a huge amount of information and so little sources, in a small town like nola something like this is nothing but trouble. 90% of all this is made totally made up with no backup. I think this should be removed from wikipedia because its not a event that took place except on paper. Oijdgoijg30jg (talk) 23:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)oijdgoijg30jg

Hello Oijdgoijg30jg, can you specify suitable sources? Regards --Serols (talk) 16:07, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

hi! a national newspaper or financial news is the only news that get fact checked. I looked yesterday for real sources and couldnt find any, thats why it needed to be taken down. The local papers dropped it after it fell apart. ONly the first paragraph is confirmed, none of the people are. In fact, gary solomon, one of the names, isnt even the right gary solomon. wikipedia has it connected to a athlete not a city business leader. None of the people on the list can be confirmed. Oijdgoijg30jg (talk) 16:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)oijdgoijg30jg

Hello Oijdgoijg30jg, the article exists since 2005, so a good source is very important. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

hi, most of it has been removed since then, because the source is just a personal website. marked low importance and the source is only a website with a lawyer advertisement on it. No real sources for the whole thing. Just a personal website and most of the info is wrong you can see yourself when you click the links Oijdgoijg30jg (talk) 16:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)oijdgoijg30jg