Talk:Britain's Next Top Model

Fair use rationale for Image:Bntm.jpg

Image:Bntm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Other Stuff

I don't think it's important to have statistics on runners up. They never do anything major, with the exception of Abigail Clancy. Nor do I think the runner up should get a colour in the call-out order on each page. They were eliminated and it's pretty obvious that they are actually the runner up.

I'm not an expert with wikipedia so can't delete pages, but do Charlotte and Stefanie justify their own pages?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Extreme Lover (talk • contribs) 18:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

It's half and half really. They both have campaigns or work because they met clients on the show and that's fairly notable. It depends on how big the campaigns are I guess. Kegzz (talk) 19:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Call out order colours

Further information: Talk:International versions of Top Model § Call-out table colors

Lianna Fowler

Why on earth has Lianna Fowler's page been deleted? She's been easily the most successful of the five winners - garnering appearances in Russian and British Vogue, and is still signed to Models 1. And I don't think I've ever seen a winner of a Top Model show without their own page. Can't we get it reinstated?

Catherine Thomas

should Catherine get her own page?????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smartie.Pantz4 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

I personally think so Eurotom1234567890 (talk) 16:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely no way. She's not been signed to a major agency - what's the point? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.154.102.195 (talk) 11:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Constant Vandalism

I have been noticing that someone, who hasn't got an account has been vandilising the cycles. They put random names and countries up to I think Cycle 16. If anyone sees it, could you immeadeately delete it please? Eurotom1234567890 (talk) 16:54, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Call-out table format

Copied from Australia's Next Top Model talk page:

I will publicly say this. I don't care if the article OUR call-out tables are white in the void areas instead of black because it conforms to the Wikipedia manual of style WP:MOS while the black tables do not. I hope all those IP editors understand the point I am trying to get across here. Thanks. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 11:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Items in parentheses (about Elite and Teen Vogue)

Feel free to reinstate them if you think I'm in the wrong, but I think most people who have seen an edition of Next Top Model know the prizes usually consist of a magazine spread and a modeling contract of some sort. And I personally do not think Company magazine is like Teen Vogue, a magazine the American franchise has never been linked with. (Yes, I know the Australian franchise has been linked with Vogue, but it wasn't Teen Vogue.) THE evil fluffyface (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Redirects

The following redirects need adding (I can't do it, as I am not a member)

"bintm" redirecting to Britain & Ireland's Next Top Model

"bintm7" redirecting to Britain & Ireland's Next Top Model Cycle 7

"bintm8" redirecting to Britain & Ireland's Next Top Model Cycle 8

"bntm7" redirecting to Britain & Ireland's Next Top Model Cycle 7

"bntm8" redirecting to Britain & Ireland's Next Top Model Cycle 8

And maybe the "bintm[+number]" codes for all the other cycles as well. 136.8.33.70 (talk) 10:44, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

male models

Is there a male equivalent to Britian's next top model or a combination of male & female show ? Thankyou Angela cox & George William Atkinson 92.21.159.210 (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Make me a supermodel U.K. Doesn't air anymore though. Trafalk09 (talk) 19:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Britain's Next Top Model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150511110058/http://www.bntmlive.com/ to http://www.bntmlive.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 26 July 2017 (UTC)