Talk:Britains

Untitled

Confusion about the start of the deetail range: The figure bases indicate that production was started in 1971. The article is also blinding out the recent focus on WW2, Zulu Wars, etc. and an expanded programme which is covering traditional toy soldiers as well as the more realistic "matte finish" range.—Preceding unsigned comment added by LAWalter1 (talk • contribs) 08:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Britains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.planetdiecast.com/index.php?option=com_jfusion&Itemid=472&node_id=2495&task=category&jfile=index.php/Britains&browser_id=
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080704130224/http://www.realtoysoldiers.com/ to http://www.realtoysoldiers.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}). This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 23 March 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 12:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

---

Britains (toy brand) → Britains – This article was moved to its current title to create a disambiguation page. However, this dab page has been reverted and a redirect created to this article. The original page move should be reverted, as there is no other article with this exact name. Hatnotes can be created if there is confusion. Natg 19 (talk) 16:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

• Support. There are no other articles on anything called "Britains" from which to disambiguate. Ham II (talk) 16:55, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
• Support - This is clearly the primary topic. I note, however, that the bold move was back in June 2022, and the attempt to create a DAB page was yesterday, so too late to revert an undiscussed move. Nevertheless the reasoning for this requested move is sound. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 17:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
• Support - Insufficient DAB had become a redirect, no other "Britains", hatnotes can be added if needed. DankJae 23:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
• Support per nomination, Ham II, Sirfurboy and DankJae. It is counterintuitive to have Britains redirecting to Britains (toy brand). —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 06:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
• Support per nom. – CityUrbanism 🗩 🖉 16:39, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
• Support Per others. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:47, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
• Support Ditto. Can we call WP:SNOWPRO on this now? - X201 (talk) 10:16, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
• Weak oppose. Seems this word being a plausible misspelling for "Britons" might be notable. Steel1943 (talk) 20:43, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

  @Steel1943 this could just be handled by a hatnote. Natg 19 (talk) 21:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.