This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Latest comment: 5 months ago6 comments3 people in discussion
If there were frequent, notable attacks on the library then having a qualifying date would make sense. But since this is the only notable hack, perhaps the page should be renamed to lose the year. Chumpiht 21:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
OK. It's customary to await some sort of wp:consensus, with a few pitching in with their opinions, or with some time passing. But then again, I'm not grumbling. Thanks. Chumpiht 22:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I was erring on the side of "bold" and it seemed sensible and non-controversial. Efficiency! jengod (talk) 22:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'll add my support to the renaming. Rupples (talk) 22:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Wahey! Consensus! Chumpiht 22:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply