Talk:British Pregnancy Advisory Service

Merge tag

The Ann Furedi article is thin and has been in a repeated deletion discussion (controversy?). Perhaps it should be merged with this article?--Anchoress 04:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Strongly agree. Not sure the Furedi article is controversial, just wafer-thin and not well written. It's also questionable that the woman is worthy of a separate WP article. Deep 13 07:24, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

PS. Nicely written article! Deep 13 17:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, Deep.--Anchoress 22:45, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Seems like a good merge.--Peta 07:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't understand

Why should the categories be formatted like [[Category:Foo|*]] instead of [[Category:Foo]]? It causes this article not to alphabetize in it's categories; what's gained by that? -GTBacchus^(talk) 07:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

There's no reason why it should be done like that; I'm not experienced creating articles, I just did it the way I've seen it done in other articles. Sorry it wasn't the way you wanted. I didn't revert cuz I don't agree with you, I reverted because you messed up the formatting, it delisted one of the categories and put the category text up with the body text. I didn't know what you were trying to do (maybe partly because of your completely non-descriptive edit summary), so I just reverted. Please don't assume that a) everyone knows as much as you, and b) we haven't done what you think we should do for some diabolical reason.--Anchoress 07:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, that was my carelessness, messing up the formatting. I really didn't think you were up to anything diabolical, I just think the phrase "what have you got against the alphabet?" is funny to use in an edit summary. Sorry if I gave the wrong idea; I could have been clearer. -GTBacchus^(talk) 07:55, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

It wasn't funny at all. But apology accepted, and thanks for clarifying. Actually IIRC I went to another abortion-related article and just copied the categories, deleting the couple that didn't apply.--Anchoress 07:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Sometimes, that * is useful, like if you're putting the article Abortion into Category:Abortion, it's good to use the star so it floats to the top of the list. When entering people in categories, the best way to do it is like: [[Category:Pro-choice activists|Furedi, Ann]] - then she alphabetizes under F. Sorry if I'm boring you, but once you know... you know. -GTBacchus^(talk) 08:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

OK, that's cool. I like learning new stuff. Can't promise to remember (I hardly ever create articles), but I *will* remember where the instructions are, so I'll come back here and remind myself.--Anchoress 08:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ALEXEIS (talk • contribs)

June 2011 amendments

I am not at all sure why Roslyn23 made the amendments on 13 June 2011. Is this some kind of censorship? The BPAS may be a different organisation today from what it was in the past, but that is no reason to attempt to air-brush out history. If people wish to read about this, or any other, organisation's present activities, they can go to the organisation's current website.

Would Roslyn23 care to reveal him/herself? BPAS is connected with Rosslyn Road and I am wondering whether there is any connection.

An explanation for the deletions would be appreciated. In the meantime, I have restored some of the text which was deleted. ALEXEIS

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on British Pregnancy Advisory Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111103093659/http://www.politics.co.uk/opinion-formers/british-pregnancy-advisory-service-bpas/our-services to http://www.politics.co.uk/opinion-formers/british-pregnancy-advisory-service-bpas/our-services
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928215738/http://www.bpas.org/bpasknowledge.php?year=2011&npage=0&page=81&news=436 to http://www.bpas.org/bpasknowledge.php?year=2011&npage=0&page=81&news=436
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723024308/http://www.fpa.org.uk/campaignsandadvocacy/advocacyandlobbying/westminster/latest-activity/hfe-bill-debate to http://www.fpa.org.uk/campaignsandadvocacy/advocacyandlobbying/westminster/latest-activity/hfe-bill-debate

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British Pregnancy Advisory Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.calthorpe-clinic.co.uk/keynote_speech.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928215738/http://www.bpas.org/bpasknowledge.php?year=2011&npage=0&page=81&news=436 to http://www.bpas.org/bpasknowledge.php?year=2011&npage=0&page=81&news=436
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723024308/http://www.fpa.org.uk/campaignsandadvocacy/advocacyandlobbying/westminster/latest-activity/hfe-bill-debate to http://www.fpa.org.uk/campaignsandadvocacy/advocacyandlobbying/westminster/latest-activity/hfe-bill-debate

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC)