Talk:British Science Association

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Red-tailed hawk in topic Copyright problem removed

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 10 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): APowell93, Cffc77, Cml3nc. Peer reviewers: Jdax2b, Squatch BH 1117.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Influence of decision agaist Babbage's Analytical Engine

edit

I have removed "This decision probably delayed the computer revolution by many decades.{{Fact|date=November 2007" There is a good discussion of this topic on the WP article on the Analytical Engine. Vernon White . . . Talk 18:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Science Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British Science Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

BA screw threads and Charles Babbage's Analytical Engine

edit

I have added citations for the information under the "Other" sub-header, specifically about the BA screw threads and Charle's Babbage's Analytical Engine. I used the archived reports as sources that were found at the end of the references section of the article. I removed a small sentence at the end of the BA screw thread paragraph, as there was no citation nor easily found source to back up the information of when and why the BA standard fell out of practice.

--APowell93 (talk) 19:49, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Additions to "History" and "Perception of Science in the UK" sections

edit

I am adding additional information in the History and Perception of Science in the UK section. Specifically, I found details of how the Association was organized at the beginning that I feel are significant to their history. I also found information about the changing of perspective the Association went through to arrive at their current views, which should provide a more natural transition from the history of the Association to its current activities.

--APowell93 (talk) 15:29, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Addition to the original first paragraph under "British Science Association" Header

edit

I will be adding additional information about what the British Science Association is doing in presents time to help diversify and get many people involved in science and what their mission and goals are. In response to Arms & Hearts, I completely agree with what you are saying and I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. I will actively be working on the opening paragraph to make it sound less like an advertisement or more as if its coming from outside reliable resources. Cml3nc (talk) 21:13, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Lead section

edit

The lead section of this article reads to me like an advertisement or press release, or at best like a summary of what the BSA says about itself rather than what reliable sources have said about the BSA. That may be because it is such a summary: all but one of the seven references cited in the lead section is from the BSA website. Can we rewrite the lead section to more closely resemble a part of an encyclopaedia article? – Arms & Hearts (talk) 21:45, 14 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Edits to the opening paragraph and additions under "British Science Week"

edit

I will be revising the opening paragraph of the page so that it resembles more of an encyclopedia article as Arms & Hearts pointed out. I will also be adding two new paragraphs under "British Science Week" explaining what the Huxley Summit and Media Fellowship Schemes are which are both organized by the British Science Association. Cml3nc (talk) 19:20, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Publications

edit

The British Association used to hold its annual meetings in different cities around Great Britain and Ireland before it switched to using London only. Through much of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries each meeting was accompanied by the publication of a volume or volumes (variously titled Handbook, Guidebook, Survey or Scientific Study) about the town and its region. These covered the local geology, archaeology, history industry, institutions and many other topics and are still to be found in second-hand book shops. They don't seem to have been digitized yet. The British Medical Association was similarly peripatetic and also used to publish volumes of local interest. NRPanikker (talk) 14:09, 5 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

BA or BAAS

edit

Is

Until 2009 it was known as the British Association for the Advancement of Science (BA).

to be rewritten

Until 2009 it was known as the British Association for the Advancement of Science (BAAS).

? (at least, this is the acronym in my books).

151.29.76.84 (talk) 18:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.britishscienceassociation.org/APPG. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply