Talk:British consular protection for BN(O) passport holders

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

The title

edit

Umm... Is there a way to shorten the length of the article title here...? Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 06:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

British claim

edit

The British Government claims that British National (Overseas) passport holders enjoy the same level of consular service in third countries (outside the UK and PRC) as other British Nationals. [1]

So the UK government claims that. What do other EU countries claim? There's a rule saying that EU citizens may enjoy consular protection from embassies and consulates of other EU countries, at least if there's no embassy or consulate of the own country anywhere nearby. So British citizens residing in the UK can go to, say, the French or the Dutch embassy, and gain protection there. Can BN(O) citizens also gain protection from French and Dutch embassies? (212.247.11.156 (talk) 09:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC))Reply

In short -- No. My understanding is that BN(O) passport holders are not entitled to consular assistance from other EU countries. This is because, unlike British Citizens (BC), people with BN(O) status are not EU citizens - as is clear from the fact that the BN(O) passport, unlike the BC passport, does not state "European Union" on the cover. The BN(O) status was created to provide a continuing British commitment to former Hong Kong BDTCs when the latter status automatically expired after the 30 June 1997 transfer of sovereignty. The BN(O) passport is a legacy of the British Empire - it is a specifically British government commitment - and other EU countries have no consular obligation towards BN(O) passport holders.--Whimsical Oracle (talk) 23:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British consular protection enjoyed by BN(O) passport holders outside the PRC and the UK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British consular protection for BN(O) passport holders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:39, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply