Talk:British railway technical manuals
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name of article
editI created this page because most of the documents lack a page of their own, though I'm slowly trying to fix that. "Techincal Manuals" is how National Rail refer to the ones their website mentions. It seems a fair title, but there may be a better one. There is I think a role for this page as an "overview" page, in addition to document-specific pages, explaining how the documents relate etc, who is controlling them in this age of privatised railways etc. Thoughts on the title though? Graldensblud 14:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
What on earth does this mean?
edit"Additionally, there exist the UK railway by-laws, which exist under the Transport Act 2000. [13]. It is noted for beginning with item 1 as "queuing"; both the existence of bylaws on the subject, and their prominent placement, being seen as typical of Britain in some quarters."15:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on British railway technical manuals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070613225253/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/legislation/regs/ to http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/legislation/regs/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Seems fine Dr Sludge (talk) 06:41, 9 November 2016 (UTC)