Talk:Britney (disambiguation)

Latest comment: 13 years ago by RegentsPark in topic Requested move 2

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No move. No basis in policy or naming conventions provided in nominating argument (thus also not in any Support votes that simply say, "per nom"). On the other hand, the Oppose argument is strongly based on policy (i.e., WP:PRIMARYTOPIC). Only Support vote to even mention primary topic did not stand up to scrutiny ("poor choice of words") when challenged by Powers. One Support vote was based on the Madonna comparison, but that was debunked too. Discounting the Support arguments accordingly, and by considering consensus of the Wikipedia community as expressed in WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, consensus is to not move.

Some support for merge with Brittany, but, again, not based on conventions or policy, and no consensus for that.

By the way, googling for "Britney" at either google.com or google.co.uk results in a page of results that are all related to the singer. Born2cycle (talk) 22:57, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply



Britney (disambiguation)Britney — Currently the latter title redirects to Britney Spears. A look at the history of that title indicates multiple people have disagreed, but been reverted. I personally maintain that Britney is too common of a name to simply push it to Ms. Spears; there are other contexts (including misspellings of Brittany (name)). Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2

edit
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved. Consensus appears to support the powers interpretation of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. --rgpk (comment) 15:12, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Britney (disambiguation)Britney – Going to try to take another whack at this. I don't believe Spears is the primary use of "Britney". She is not so well known that when you think of "Britney" you automatically think of her, and her alone ("much more likely than all the others" is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC says). She's best known by her full name "Britney Spears," not by her first name solely. When people type in that name into the box, they may also be thinking of the spelling of "Brittany" instead and I believe the confusion is ambiguous enough to warrant a disambig. She may be "more well-known" than the other listed Britneys, but that does not necessarily automatically grant her the title of primary topic. hbdragon88 (talk) 23:07, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Support Spears is not known by one name. 65.94.47.217 (talk) 04:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Support - Britney Spears is not the primary topic for "Britney". –AnemoneProjectors10:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, Britney being a fairly common name, one would expect, when typing in "Britney" to get a list of people/places named Britney. Rennell435 (talk) 12:11, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, for all of the reasons given. Britney Spears does not release records under the name "Britney", but "Britney Spears". The primary topic should be a disambiguation page like any other common name. --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. Spears is clearly the primary topic for this non-traditional spelling. If Madonna had spelled her name "Madawna", I can tell you it would not be a disambiguation page. Srnec (talk) 16:07, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
    • There would not be because there would be nothing else named "Mawdawna". People with completely unique surnames, such as Assange, redirect to the subject we have an article on. Britney, however, is a more common first name than "Mawdawna" would be. hbdragon88 (talk) 22:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Support - The singer is usually known as Britney Spears, not as just Britney. So Britney Spears is not the primary topic for Britney. --Carioca (talk) 19:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose; the presence of other 'Brittany's should not affect whether the singer is the primary topic for "Britney". She is. The other uses don't even come close. Powers T 01:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
    • Powers gets it. Spelling matters. Srnec (talk) 05:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
    • Neither of you have addressed the argument that she isn't known solely by the name "Britney" as, say, Madonna or Elvis are (Elvis redirects, but Madonna isn't the primary topic). That's another reason why we want "Britney" to be a disambiguation page. hbdragon88 (talk) 19:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
      • That's because the argument is irrelevant. It would be relevant to a proposal to move Britney Spears to Britney, but not to the current proposal. The question before us is not "What name is she most readily known by?" but "What topic is most likely to be sought under the name 'Britney'?" Powers T 23:59, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per LtPowers. The other articles currently listed on the dab page are an album (by Spears), a documentary (about Spears), a song (referring to Spears) and another song that's actually a redirect to an album article. Of the other people called Britney listed on the dab page, Britney Stevens comes closest to Spears' page views, and Spears still gets about 50 times more views than that article.[1][2] Looks like a clear case of primary topic in my view. Jafeluv (talk) 08:17, 5 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose as by some way the best known meaning, I had never heard of the other 2 people. It is irrelevant that she is probably more often known by her full name, she is often referred to as plain Britney, Elvis Presley usually used his full name. Misspelling Brittany could happen occasionally but not that often. PatGallacher (talk) 11:02, 5 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose Chris Crocker put it best: Leave "Britney" alone! Of course she is the primary topic for "Britney". See Britney -wikipedia and Bing. Kauffner (talk) 04:18, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Support - all of the topic about Britney Spears is not the primary topic of the said singer. ApprenticeFan work 09:48, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose - another painful example of how poorly understood WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is. People, please, go read it. As Powers said: The question before us is not "What name is she most readily known by?" but "What topic is most likely to be sought under the name 'Britney'?". Seriously, when someone types "Britney" into the Search box and clicks "Go", do you really think they're likely looking for something other than the singer? Seriously? Like what? Have you even look at the possibilities on the dab page? Have you compared the page view counts? There is no comparison! Yes, getting users to the page they seek quickly and efficiently is about improving the encyclopedia. --Born2cycle (talk) 00:38, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. IMO this is a classic case showing how a DAB s hould be at the undisambiguated name. Yes, I have read WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and don't agree on the interpretation sbove. Andrewa (talk) 08:49, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.